MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2907046224 · doi:10.1215/00138282-49.1.125

Vignettes from Hong Kong: On Queer Drifts across Borders

2011· article· en· W2907046224 on OpenAlexaffabout
Helen Hok‐Sze Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish Language Notes · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHong Kong and Taiwan Politics
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueerIconDownloadMovie theaterCitationAudience measurementSection (typography)English languageHistoryMedia studiesLibrary scienceSociologyArt historyWorld Wide WebComputer scienceLinguisticsGender studiesPhilosophyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| March 01 2011 Vignettes from Hong Kong: On Queer Drifts across Borders Helen Hok-Sze Leung Helen Hok-Sze Leung Simon Fraser University helen_leung@sfu.ca Helen Hok-Sze Leung is an associate professor in gender, sexuality, and women's studies at Simon Fraser University in Canada. She has published widely on queer cinema and is the author of Undercurrents: Queer Culture and Postcolonial Hong Kong (UBC Press, 2008) and Farewell My Concubine: A Queer Film Classic (Arsenal Pulp Press, 2010). She is one of the co-editors of the Queer Asia Book Series published by Hong Kong University Press and a member of the editorial board of the Journal of Chinese Cinemas. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google English Language Notes (2011) 49 (1): 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1215/00138282-49.1.125 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation Helen Hok-Sze Leung; Vignettes from Hong Kong: On Queer Drifts across Borders. English Language Notes 1 March 2011; 49 (1): 125–130. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00138282-49.1.125 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search Books & JournalsAll JournalsEnglish Language Notes Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2011 Regents of the University of Colorado2011 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal Issue Section: Guest Editor: Howard Chiang, Princeton University You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.327
Threshold uncertainty score0.650

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0270.008
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish Language NotesSame topicHong Kong and Taiwan PoliticsFrench-language works237,207