MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2907077102 · doi:10.1109/newcas.2018.8585621

Power-Silicon Efficient All-Digital △Σ TDC with Differential Gated Delay Line Time Integrator

2018· article· en· W2907077102 on OpenAlexaff
Parth Parekh, Fei Yuan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntegratorElectronic engineeringCMOSTime delay and integrationFlicker noiseFigure of meritTime-to-digital converterJitterLine (geometry)Computer scienceEngineeringElectrical engineeringNoise figureVoltageAmplifierClock signal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an all-digital 1st-order 1-bit ΔΣ time-to-digital converter (TDC). A single-step integration method is proposed to perform differential time integration using a bi-directional gated delay line (BDGDL) to reduce integration time. An in-depth investigation into the impact of process uncertainty on the TDC is provided. The TDC is designed in an IBM 130 nm 1.2 V CMOS technology and analyzed using Spectre with BSIM4 device models. The simulation results of the TDC with a 244 kHz sinusoidal input of amplitude 333 ps over frequency range from flicker noise corner frequency to 3rd-order harmonic frequency demonstrate that the TDC provides SNDR of 39.8 dB and time resolution of 4.2 ps while consuming 396.6 μW. The figure-of-merit (FOM) of the TDC is 3.6 pJ/step, better that of reported TDCs alike. The effect of process uncertainty on the TDC can be minimized by tuning the delay blocks of the TDC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207