MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Autonomous Demand Response Algorithm based on Online Convex Optimization

2018· article· en· W2907141168 on OpenAlexaff
Shahab Bahrami, Yu Christine Chen, Vincent W. S. Wong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemand responseComputer scienceMathematical optimizationConvex optimizationBenchmark (surveying)Scheduling (production processes)ScheduleLoad managementJacobian matrix and determinantRegular polygonElectricityMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A price-based demand response program is a viable solution for distribution network operators (DNOs) to motivate electricity consumers toward scheduling their load demand during off-peak periods. This paper addresses the problem of load scheduling in a demand response program, while accounting for load demand uncertainty and the distribution network operational constraints. The centralized load control is a non convex optimization problem due to the ac power flow equations. We use convex relaxation techniques to transform the problem into a semidefinite program (SDP), which is solved using online convex optimization techniques to address the load demand uncertainty. To tackle the issue of computational complexity, we use proximal Jacobian alternating direction method of multipliers (PJ-ADMM) to decompose the centralized problem into the customers' load scheduling subproblems. The decentralized algorithm is executed by each customer to schedule its load demand in real-time. Via simulations on the IEEE 37-bus test feeder, we show that the proposed algorithm enables customers to approximate the optimal load profile in the benchmark scenario without load uncertainty, and the approximation is tight. Furthermore, we show a negligible gap of 2.3% between the customers' cost with the proposed algorithm and the cost in the benchmark scenario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.701
Threshold uncertainty score0.712

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207