Primjena inertnog prašiva dijatomejske zemlje u kontroli žitnog kukuljičara <i>Rhyzopertha dominica </i>Fab. (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae<i>) na sortama </i>pšenice, raži i zobi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Laboratorijski je ispitan insekticidni učinak dijatomejske zemlje na skladišnog štetnika, žitnog kukuljičara Rhyzopertha dominica Fab. zaprašivanjem tri različite sorte pšenice (Divana, Kraljica i Vulkan), zobi (BC Marta, Winnipeg i Winsent) i raži (Albedo, Marcelo i Picasso). Cilj je bio utvrditi ima li dijatomejska zemlja jednaku djelotvornost kod različitih sorti žitarica, te utvrditi utjecaj prašiva na fizikalna svojstva sorata. Pri dozi od 500 ppm nakon 7 dana ekspozicije, najviši prosječni mortalitet kukuljičara je postignut kod raži (98,5%), zatim kod pšenice (95,9%), te najniži kod zobi (84,2%). Značajna razlika u djelotvornosti uočena je jedino kod zobi; između sorti Winsent i BC Marta, te u vremenu ekspozicije (između 7 i 21 dan kod sorata BC Marta i Winnipeg, te između 7 i 14 dana kod sorte Winsent). Dijatomejska zemlja je kod svih ispitivanih sorti žitarica djelovala na sniženje hektolitarske mase, posebice kod sorti pšenice (za 4,3-5,0 kg hl-1). Najmanje sniženje hektolitarske mase uočeno je kod raži, kod sorte Marcelo (za 0,3 kg hl-1). Također je kod tretiranih sorti žitarica (osim kod sorte zobi Winsent) zabilježeno blago sniženje vlage zrna (za 0,2 do 1,0%), kao i promjena temperature zrna od ± 0,1 do 0,4 °C. Temeljem dobivenih rezultata, vidljivo je da djelotvornost dijatomejske zemlje značajno varira ovisno o sorti žitarica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".