MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2907157272 · doi:10.1177/0954406218820048

An analytical approach for vibration analysis of laminated orthotropic beam based on nonlocal theory

2018· article· en· W2907157272 on OpenAlex
Saeed Khadem Moshir, Hamidreza Eipakchi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthotropic materialVibrationNonlinear systemParametric statisticsTransient responseBeam (structure)Equations of motionElasticity (physics)Natural frequencyImpulse (physics)Multiple-scale analysisPlate theoryPhysicsMechanicsMathematical analysisClassical mechanicsStructural engineeringMathematicsFinite element methodAcousticsEngineeringOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On the basis of the first-order shear deformation beam theory, free vibrations and dynamic response of orthotropic laminated beam subjected to transient and harmonic loading have been studied based on Eringen’s nonlocal elasticity theory. Three coupled nonlinear governing partial differential equations of motion are derived using Hamilton’s principle. The purely analytical perturbation method as well as the method of multiple scales are used for the solution. A parametric study is carried out to realize the effect of small-scale and axial static load on the natural frequencies, transient, and harmonic responses. In addition, the obtained results have been compared with numerical solutions and literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.487
Threshold uncertainty score0.634

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it