MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2907177214 · doi:10.4000/books.aaccademia.4661

A Markovian Kernel-based Approach for itaLIan Speech acT labEliNg

2018· book-chapter· en· W2907177214 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Danilo Croce, Roberto Basili

Bibliographic record

VenueAccademia University Press eBooks · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and dialogue systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council CanadaUniversità degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
KeywordsUtteranceComputer scienceTask (project management)Artificial intelligenceKernel (algebra)Context (archaeology)Support vector machineHidden Markov modelNatural language processingSpeech recognitionMarkov processFeature (linguistics)LinguisticsMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the UNITOR system that participated to the itaLIan Speech acT labEliNg task within the context of EvalIta 2018. A Structured Kernel-based Support Vector Machine has been here applied to make the classification of the dialogue turns sensitive to the syntactic and semantic information of each utterance, without relying on any task-specific manual feature engineering. Moreover, a specific Markovian formulation of the SVM is adopted, so that the labeling of each utterance depends on speech acts assigned to the previous turns. The UNITOR system ranked first in the competition, suggesting that the combination of the adopted structured kernel and the Markovian modeling is beneficial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAccademia University Press eBooksSame topicSpeech and dialogue systemsFrench-language works237,207