MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2907198993 · doi:10.1109/iecon.2018.8591684

Transient Event Classification Based on Wavelet Neuronal Network and Matched Filters

2018· article· en· W2907198993 on OpenAlexaff
Luis Rueda, Alben Cardenas, Sousso Kélouwani, Kodjo Agbossou

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSmart gridContext (archaeology)Transient (computer programming)Event (particle physics)WaveletFeature extractionEnergy (signal processing)Wavelet transformData miningArtificial intelligenceFilter (signal processing)Process (computing)Building automationEnergy consumptionPattern recognition (psychology)Real-time computingEngineeringComputer visionMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Detailed information about load behavior and home's occupancy is important to implement Home Energy Management Systems (HEMS) capable of reducing energy consumption while maintaining user comfort. This is why Non-intrusive Appliance Load Monitoring (NIALM) and Non-intrusive Occupancy Monitoring (NIOM) have an important role to play in the new context of smart grid. This paper shows the implementation of two algorithms for transient event detection and classification, which is the first key step of a NIOM process. The first method employs Wavelet transform for the feature extraction and Artificial Neural Networks for the classification problem. The second method is based on the theory of Matched Filters to achieve the transient event detection and classification. Experiments permitted to validate the proposed methods using a dataset of occupied residential building.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207