MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2907272248 · doi:10.1109/pimrc.2018.8580763

A Novel Multiple Access Technique Based on Antenna Radiation Pattern Modulation

2018· article· en· W2907272248 on OpenAlexaff
Javad Hoseyni, Jacek Ilow

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAntenna (radio)SIGNAL (programming language)Transmission (telecommunications)Space-division multiple accessTransmitterAngle of arrivalModulation (music)DetectorElectronic engineeringTelecommunications linkTelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)PhysicsAcousticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper extends Beam Angle Shift Keying (BASK) transmission technique into a multi-user version called Beam Angle Multiple Access (BAMA). BASK is a recently developed antenna beam pattern modulation scheme where at the transmitter, the block of information bits is mapped into a spatial symbol selecting the beam for the unmodulated carrier signal. At the receiver, after specular reflections, the carrier signal arrives at the receiver from one direction over the duration of the spatial symbol and the receiver antenna array is used to detect single-user data through angle-of-arrival (AOA) estimation. In this paper, multiple access on the uplink is achieved by assigning subsets of beams to individual users signaling with BASK. At the base station, over the duration of the spatial symbol the receiver decides on a subset of possible multiple AoAs corresponding to synchronized spatial symbols from different users. Specifically, we propose a maximum-likelihood (ML) detector which can successfully decode incoming data from multiple simultaneous BASK transmissions by deploying a linear array of receive antennas. Unlike in spatial division multiple access where a fixed beam arrangement is used, BAMA detects the beams used by multiple users on a symbol-by-symbol basis. In the proposed scheme, the management and selection of beams are crucial with respect to capacity of the system. It is demonstrated that the detection reliability of the spatial symbols in BAMA is determined by the number of antennas used at the receiver and the actual angles of signal arrival.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207