MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2907276336 · doi:10.1109/redec.2018.8597975

Optimal PMU placement for reverse power flow detection

2018· article· en· W2907276336 on OpenAlexafffund
Zeina Rammal, Nivine Abou Daher, Hadi Y. Kanaan, Imad Mougharbel, Maarouf Saad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersSaint Joseph UniversityUniversité LibanaiseÉcole de technologie supérieure
KeywordsPhasorComputer sciencePower (physics)Power flowMATLABAC powerGenetic algorithmRange (aeronautics)VoltageVoltage regulatorElectric power systemDistributed generationControl theory (sociology)Node (physics)Phasor measurement unitReliability engineeringMathematical optimizationEngineeringRenewable energyControl (management)Electrical engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The integration of renewable energy sources alter the radial nature of the conventional distribution network and causes the power flow to reverse in some periods. As the voltage regulator is normally designed for unidirectional power flow, this may cause voltage violations on the distribution feeder resulting in faults and cuts. To solve this problem, monitoring of the distribution network is essential before taking any control or protection measures. From this fact emerges the importance of reverse power flow detection. In this paper, the optimal phasor measurement placement for reverse power flow detection is discussed. An extensive literature review and a comparison among a wide range of existing optimization algorithms is done. Then genetic algorithm is selected to solve this problem. Global Optimization Tool of Matlab are used to test the proposed algorithm on IEEE-14 and IEEE-39 node test feeders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207