MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<scp>C</scp> anadian <scp>A</scp> nthropology <scp>S</scp> ociety / <scp>S</scp> ociété <scp>C</scp> anadienne <scp>d</scp> 'Anthropologie ( <scp>CASCA</scp> )

2018· other· en· W2907302242 on OpenAlexaffabout
Francine Saillant

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Encyclopedia of Anthropology · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdvertisingBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This entry sets forth a vision of Canadian anthropology, especially at its beginnings. More specifically, the text presents its stages of development and its major influences, at the crossroads of US, French, and British anthropology. Canadian anthropology became established with the foundation of the Canadian Anthropology Society / Société Canadienne d'Anthropologie, which in a sense marked the final step in the discipline's establishment, in conjunction with the creation of various university departments and leading scientific journals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.064
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.064
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0080.007
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.004
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0130.027
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0140.009
Research integrity0.0130.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Encyclopedia of AnthropologySame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207