MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2907337757 · doi:10.4153/cjm-2010-055-x

A Fractal Function Related to the John–Nirenberg Inequality for<i>Q</i><sub>α</sub>(ℝ<sup>n</sup>)

2010· article· en· W2907337757 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Mathematics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Approximation and Integration
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTsinghua UniversityConcordia University
KeywordsMathematicsCombinatoricsMonotone polygonInteger (computer science)HaarFractalNirenberg and Matthaei experimentFunction (biology)GraphMathematical analysisGeometryWavelet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A borderline case function f for Q α (ℝ n ) spaces is defined as a Haar wavelet decomposition, with the coefficients depending on a fixed parameter β &gt; 0. On its support I 0 = [0, 1] n , f ( x ) can be expressed by the binary expansions of the coordinates of x . In particular, f = f β ∈ Q α (ℝ n ) if and only if α &lt; β &lt; , while for β = α, it was shown by Yue and Dafni that f satisfies a John–Nirenberg inequality for Q α (ℝ n ). When β ≠ 1, f is a self-affine function. It is continuous almost everywhere and discontinuous at all dyadic points inside I 0 . In addition, it is not monotone along any coordinate direction in any small cube. When the parameter β ∈ (0, 1), f is onto from I 0 to , and the graph of f has a non-integer fractal dimension n + 1 − β .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it