MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2907338658 · doi:10.1016/j.dib.2018.12.085

Knowledge translation dataset: An e-health intervention for pregnancy in inflammatory bowel disease

2018· article· en· W2907338658 on OpenAlexafffund
Reed T. Sutton, Kelsey Wierstra, Vivian Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueData in Brief · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and Medication Impact
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Alberta
FundersMacEwan UniversityCrohn's and Colitis CanadaUniversity of AlbertaAlberta InnovatesAlberta Innovates - Health Solutions
KeywordsDemographicsInflammatory bowel diseaseContext (archaeology)MedicineDiseaseReproductive healthPregnancyCohortIntervention (counseling)Knowledge translationFamily medicineInternal medicineComputer scienceEnvironmental healthDemographyKnowledge managementNursingPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents data collected from a cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease, who expressed interest in family planning and reproductive health in their clinical context. They were randomized (1:1, text-only vs. multimedia content) to access an online e-health portal containing educational information on the topic. The data collected includes baseline demographics, medication history, reproductive history, as well as standardized, validated questionnaires on knowledge ('CCPKnow'), reproductive concerns, beliefs about medications ('BMQ'), and medication adherence ('MARS-5'). These questionnaires were administered prior to the intervention, immediately after accessing the materials, and a minimum of 6 months later (without re-accessing the online material). Two publications have been generated from analysis and aggregation of the CCPKnow data ("Pregnancy-related Beliefs and Concerns of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients are Modified After Accessing e-Health Portal" (Sutton et al., in press), "Innovative Online Educational Portal Improves Disease-Specific Reproductive Knowledge Among Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease" (Sutton et al., 2018) however this is an extensive dataset that could be analyzed or combined with others' datasets for further insights.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.127
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData in BriefSame topicPregnancy and Medication ImpactFrench-language works237,207