Bibliographic record
Abstract
Data on the first human infections with Y. enterocolitica in Canada were published by Lafleur et al. in Quebec, between 1966 and 1972. Practically all Y. enterocolitica strains isolated from acute gastroenteritis, septicemia, or deep-seated infections were biochemically typical and belonged to one of the previously mentioned predominant O serotypes. There are many schemes available for biochemical characterization and biotyping of Y. enterocolitica cultures and undoubtedly, each scheme has its merits. Serotyping of Y. enterocolitica cultures in conjunction with complete biochemical identification proved to be a very valuable method for differentiation of clinical pathogenic strains of environmental strains and for epidemiological purposes. Phage typing of indole-negative strains of Y. enterocolitica , serotype O:3, was a valuable procedure for typing "Continental" distribution. Nonhuman strains of Y. enterocolitica may be conveniently divided into environmental and animal strains. Most environmental strains were indole-positive, biochemically and serologically atypical, and significantly different from the strains isolated from human infections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".