MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2907401270 · doi:10.14244/198271993075

Mejora escolar, liderazgo y reforma sistémica: una retrospectiva (School improvement, leadership and systemic reform: a retrospective)

2019· article· en· W2907401270 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Hopkins

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Eletrônica de Educação · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Teacher Training
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the last four decades, the bases of research on effectiveness and school improvement have been gaining recognition at the international level. Both theoretically and empirically, they have matured through a wide range of well-documented and innovative projects in several countries. In general, these works focus on the successes and failures related to the different initiatives aimed at making schools more effective learning environments for all students. In the following article, the British researcher David Hopkins delivers evidence of the results of these efforts, summarized in five phases of development. He concludes by re?ecting on how these phases evolve and overlap, examines some myths that hinder school and systemic improvement and proposes some guidelines for future research.ResumoDurante as últimas quatro décadas, as bases da pesquisa sobre eficácia e melhora escolar vêm ganhando reconhecimento no plano internacional. Teórica e empiricamente, eles amadureceram através de uma ampla gama de projetos bem documentados e inovadores em vários países. Em geral, esses trabalhos enfocam os sucessos e fracassos relacionados às diferentes iniciativas que visam tornar as escolas ambientes de aprendizagem mais eficazes para todos os alunos. No seguinte artigo, o pesquisador britânico David Hopkins apresenta evidências dos resultados desses esforços, sintetizado em cinco fases de desenvolvimento. Ele conclui re?etindo sobre como essas fases evoluem e se sobrepõem, examina alguns mitos que impedem a melhora sistêmica escolar e propõe algumas diretrizes para pesquisas futuras.ResumenDurante las cuatro últimas décadas, las bases de la investigación sobre la efectividad y la mejora escolar han ido cobrando reconocimiento en el plano internacional. Tanto a nivel teórico como empírico, han madurado a través de una amplia gama de bien documentados e innovadores proyectos en varios países. Por lo general, estos trabajos se centran en los éxitos y fracasos relativos a las diferentes iniciativas tendientes a que las escuelas se transformen en entornos de aprendizaje más efectivos para todos los estudiantes. En el siguiente capítulo, el investigador británico David Hopkins entrega evidencia de los resultados de dichos esfuerzos, resumida en cinco fases de desarrollo. Concluye re?exionando sobre cómo dichas fases evolucionan y se superponen, examina algunos mitos que obstaculizan el mejoramiento escolar y sistémico y propone algunas orientaciones para futuras investigaciones.Keywords: School improvement, Leadership, Systemic reform, Learning.Palavras-chave: Melhora escolar, Liderança, Reforma Sistêmica, Aprendizagem.Palabras claves: Mejora escolar, Liderazgo, Reforma sistémica, Aprendizaje.ReferencesALSBURY, T. L.The future of school board governance: Relevancy and revelation. Blue Ridge Summit, PA: Rowman & Littlefield Education, 2008.ANDERSON, S. (ed.) School improvement in the developing world: case studies of the Agha Khan Foundation Projects. Lisse, Holanda: Swets and Zeitlinger Publishers, 2002.AVALOS, B. School Improvement in Latin America: innovations over 25 years (1980-2006). In: T. TOWNSEND (ed.) International handbook on school effectiveness and improvement. Dordrecht, NL: Springer, 2007, pp. /xx-YYY.BARBER, M. Instruction to deliver: Tony Blair, the public services and the challenge of delivery. Londres: Politico's, 2007.BARBER, M. From system effectiveness to system improvement. In: HARGREAVES, A. & FULLAN, M. (Eds.). Change wars. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree, 2009.BARBER, M.; FULLAN, M.; MACKAY, A.; ZBAR, V. Building excellent education systems: from conception to implementation at scale. Melbourne: Centre for Strategic Education Seminar Series Paper No. 189, noviembre 2009.BERENDS, M.; BODILLY, S. J.; KIRBY, S. N. Facing the challenges of whole-school reform: new American Schools after a decade. Santa Mónica, CA: RAND, 2002.BERMAN, P.; MCLAUGHLIN, M. Federal programs supporting educational change. Vol. VIII, Implementing and sustaining innovations. Santa Mónica, CA: Rand, 1978.BISHOP, R.; O’SULLIVAN, D.; BERRYMAN, M. Scaling up education reform: addressing the politics of disparity. Wellington: NZCER Press, 2010.BIRDSALL, N. The world is not flat: inequality and injustice in our global economy. WIDER Annual Lecture No. 9. Helsinki, Finlandia: UNU-Wider, 2006.BITAR, S. Why and How Latin America Should Think About the Future. Washington, DC: Inter-American Dialogue, 2013.BORMAN, G.D.; HEWES, G.M.; OVERMAN, L.T.; BROWN, S. Comprehensive School Reform and achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 73, 2003, pp. 125-230.BRANDSFORD, J. D.; BROWN, A. L.; COCKING, R. R. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999.CALDWELL, B.J.; SPINKS, J.M. The Self-managing School. Lewes: Falmer Press, 1988.CAMARA, G. Q and A with Gabriel Camara. Lead the Change Series. Issue No. 11, 2011. November. recuperado de : http://www.aera.net/educational_change_sig.htm.CLIFT, P., NUTTALL, D. AND MCCORMICK, R. Studies in School Self-Evaluation. Lewes: Falmer Press, 1987.CHAPMAN, C.; LINDSAY, G.; MUIJS, D.; HARRIS, A.; ARWECK, E.; GOODALL, A. Governance, Leadership and Management in Federations of Schools, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2010, pp. 53-75.CHILDRESS, S. Six lessons for pursuing excellence and equity at scale, Phi Delta Kappan,10(3), 2009, pp. 13–18.COLBERT, V. Q and A with Vicky Colbert. Lead the Change Series. Issue No. 29, August, 2013. Recuperado de: http://www.aera.net/educational_change_sig.htm.COMER, J. For Children’s Sake: Comer School Development Program, discussion leaders guide, New Haven, CT: Yale Child Study Center, 1992.COMER, J. Leave no child behind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2005.CRANDALL, D.P.; LOUCKS, S.F. A roadmap for school improvement: executive summary of the study of dissemination efforts supporting school improvement. Andover, MA: The Network, 1983.DALIN, P. Case Studies of Educational Innovation’, Vol IV. In: Strategies for Educational Innovation, París: CERI/OECD, 1973.DATNOW, A.; LASKY, S.; STRINGFIELD, S.; TEDDLIE, C. Systemic integration for effective reform in racially and linguistically diverse contexts. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.DAY, C.; SAMMONS, P.; LEITHWOOD, K.; HOPKINS, D.; QING GU; BROWN, C. Ten strong claims about successful school leadership. Nottingham: NCSL, 2010.DAY, C.; SAMMONS, P.; HOPKINS, D.; HARRIS, A.; LEITHWOOD, K.; QING GU; BROWN, E.; AHTARIDOU, E. Successful school leadership: linking with learning and achievement. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press, 2011.DEPARTAMENTO DE EDUCACIÓN de Estados Unidos. A Nation At Risk, 1983.DESIMONE, L. How can comprehensive school reform models be successfully implemented? Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 2002, pp. 433-479.DWYER, D. The search for instructional leadership routines and subtleties in the principal’s role, Educational Leadership, 41, 1984, pp. 32-37;EARL, L.; TORRANCE, N.; SUTHERLAND, S.; FULLAN, M.; ALI, A.S. Manitoba school improvement program final evaluation report. OISE/UT. Toronto: Walter and Duncan Gordon Foundation, 2003. Disponible en www.msip.caEARL, L.; KATZ, S. Learning from the Networked Learning Communities: Research Report. Nottingham: NCSL, 2005.EDMONDS, R. Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37 (1), 1979, pp. 15-27.ELLIOTT, J. Action Research for Educational Change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1991.ELMORE, R. F. School Reform from the Inside Out. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press, 2004.FINN, C.; MANNO, B.; VANOUREK, G. Charter Schools in Action: Renewing Public Education, Princeton, Nueva Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2001.FLEISCH, B. A history of the school effectiveness and improvement movements in Africa.’ In: T. TOWNSEND (ed.). International Handbook on School Effectiveness and Improvement. Dordrecht, NL: Springer, 2007.FLESSA, J.; BRAMWELL, D.; FERNÁNDEZ, M.; WEINSTEIN, J. School Leadership in Latin America 2000- 2016. Educational Management and Leadership, XX (X), 2017, pp. 1-25.FULLAN, M.G.; MILES, M.B.; TAYLOR, G. Organization development in schools: the state of the art. Review of Educational Research, 50 (1), 1980, pp. 121-184.FULLAN, M. The moral imperative of school leadership. Londres: Corwin Press, 2003.FULLAN, M. Leadership and sustainability. System leaders in action. Londres: SAGE, 2004.FULLAN, M. System thinkers in action: moving beyond the standards plateau. Londres/Nottingham: DfES Innovation Unit/NCSL, 2004.FULLAN, M. The new meaning of educational change. (4th Ed.). Nueva York: Teachers College Press, 2007.FULLAN, M. Large scale reform comes of age. Journal of Educational Change, 10(2), 2009, pp. 101-113.FULLAN, M. All systems go. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin, 2010.GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE. Effective schools programs: Their extent and characteristics. Gaithersberg, MD: Author, 1989.GOOD, T.L.; BROPHY, J.E. Looking In Classrooms. (8th ed.). Nueva York: Harper and Row, 2008.GLICKMAN, C. Renewing America’s schools: A guide for school-based action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993.GRAY, J.; HOPKINS, D.; REYNOLDS, D.; WILCOX, B.; FARRELL, S.; JESSON, D. Improving schools: performance and potential. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1999.HALLINGER, P.; MURPHY, J. Assessing the instructional management behaviour of principals. Elementary School Journal. 85, 1985, pp.217-247.HALLINGER, P. Leadership for learning: what we have learned from 30 years of empirical research. Centre for Strategic Education Seminar Series Paper No. 196, julio 2010.HARGREAVES, A.; HALÁSZ, G.; PONT, B. School leadership for systemic improvement in Finland. París: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2007.HARGREAVES, A.; SHIRLEY, D. The fourth way. Thousands Oakes, CA: Corwin, 2009.HARGREAVES, A.; LIEBERMAN, A.; FULLAN, M.; HOPKINS, D. Second international handbook of educational change. Vol

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0040.010
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Eletrônica de EducaçãoSame topicEducation and Teacher TrainingFrench-language works237,207