MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2907405544 · doi:10.1201/9781351069496-15

The Effect of Vegetable Oil Carriers and Adjuvants on Herbicide Efficacy

2018· book-chapter· en· W2907405544 on OpenAlexaff
K. G. Hatchard, Robert Ashford, W. B. Reed

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAllelopathy and phytotoxic interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVegetable oilEnvironmental scienceBiotechnologyBusinessChemistryBiologyFood science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canola oil adjuvants and carriers reduced or had no effect on the phytotoxicity of 2, 4- d and glyphosate. Similar results were observed when soybean oil was used instead of canola oil. However, canola oil carriers and adjuvants increased sethoxydim phytotoxicity under field conditions in 1985, but not in 1984. Under controlled environmental conditions canola oil enhanced sethoxydim activity when used as a carrier, although not as an adjuvant. Soybean oil was as effective as canola oil when used as a carrier in the laboratory, but soybean oil carriers were the most effective in the field in 1985, even though both oils did enhance phytotoxicity. When canola and soybean oils were used as adjuvants in the field, the relationship between adjuvant concentration in the spray mix and the phytotoxicity of sethoxydim varied with the application method, as did the relative effectiveness of the two oils.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAllelopathy and phytotoxic interactionsFrench-language works237,207