MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2907457399 · doi:10.1017/s0090599200035868

Empires in world history: power and the politics of difference, by Jane Burbank and Frederick Cooper, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010, 528 pp., US$35.00 (hardcover), ISBN 978-0691127088, US$24.95 (paperback), ISBN 78–0691152363

2011· article· en· W2907457399 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Nelson

Bibliographic record

VenueNationalities Papers · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Maritime and Colonial Histories
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsPower (physics)HistoryEconomic historyLaw and economicsMedia studiesSociologyPolitical scienceLawPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Empires in world history: power and the politics of difference, by Jane Burbank and Frederick Cooper, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010, 528 pp., US24.95 (paperback), ISBN 78–0691152363 - Volume 39 Issue 6

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.010
Scholarly communication0.0080.013
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNationalities PapersSame topicGlobal Maritime and Colonial HistoriesFrench-language works237,207