MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2907467821 · doi:10.1073/pnas.1817538116

Role of domain interactions in the aggregation of full-length immunoglobulin light chains

2018· article· en· W2907467821 on OpenAlexafffund
Enrico Rennella, Gareth J. Morgan, Jeffery W. Kelly

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsChemistryDimerProtein aggregationMonomerBiophysicsImmunoglobulin light chainFibrilAmyloidosisFluorescenceAmyloid (mycology)CrystallographyAntibodyBiochemistryPolymerBiologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance The misfolding and/or aggregation of proteins can give rise to amyloid diseases, including immunoglobulin light-chain (LC) amyloidosis, leading to large proteinaceous deposits in organs throughout the body. A third of patients die within a year of diagnosis. The LC structure–proteotoxicity relationships and how protein aggregation causes degeneration are not understood. Using solution NMR we characterized the strengths of interactions between different domains in the dimeric 2-domain immunoglobulin LC structure to dissect their relative importance in protecting against aggregation. The constant domain (C L ) is particularly important in conferring protection, as are the stabilities of the individual domains. Our studies establish a threshold of stability, below which aggregation occurs rapidly, suggesting that stabilizing the C L –C L domain interface could prevent aggregation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.228

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, OutcomesFrench-language works237,207