MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2907471780 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2890728

Toward Secure and Scalable Computation in Internet of Things Data Applications

2019· article· en· W2907471780 on OpenAlexaff
Xu Yuan, Xingliang Yuan, Baochun Li, Cong Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Data Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaLouisiana Board of Regents
KeywordsComputer scienceServerHomomorphic encryptionScalabilityDistributed computingEncryptionOverhead (engineering)Cloud computingComputer networkCorrectnessThe InternetDatabaseOperating systemAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ever-growing of Internet of Things (IoT) data and the new spectrum of data applications have stimulated IoT clients to outsource their data to cloud servers or datacenters. Apart from storage service, the IoT clients also desires the servers to execute functional operations per client's request. In this paper, we aim to design the secure mechanisms that allow the IoT clients to outsource their encrypted data to geographically distributed servers while supporting homomorphic computation functions. We leverage the distributed index framework to disassemble and spread data evenly across geographically distributed servers while employing the key-value store as the underlying structure for fast data retrieval. To support computing over encrypted data, we customize Shamir's secret sharing into our mechanisms to design a tunable scheme for the adaption of different IoT application scenarios. In particular, we design three tunable protocols to achieve the effective additive homomorphic computations while approaching efficiency in terms of servers utilization, computation, and storage overhead. Even the designs focus on the additive computation, we show that it can be readily extended to other types of homomorphic computations as well as verifying the correctness of stored data. Based on the proposed protocols, we design system prototypes, deploy them in Amazon Web services, and evaluate our construction experimentally. Through experimental results, we show that our designs can achieve the efficiency in various perspectives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicCryptography and Data SecurityFrench-language works237,207