MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2907538941 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04315

Real Vector Spaces and the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in ACL2(r)

2018· article· en· W2907538941 on OpenAlexaff
Carl Kwan, Mark R. Greenstreet

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematics and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCauchy–Schwarz inequalityMathematicsProduct (mathematics)Vector spaceCauchy distributionAutomated theorem provingAlgebra over a fieldInner product spaceProjection (relational algebra)Triangle inequalitySpace (punctuation)Simple (philosophy)Pure mathematicsDiscrete mathematicsInequalityComputer scienceMathematical analysisAlgorithmGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a mechanical proof of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality in ACL2(r) and a formalisation of the necessary mathematics to undertake such a proof. This includes the formalisation of $\mathbb{R}^n$ as an inner product space. We also provide an application of Cauchy-Schwarz by formalising $\mathbb R^n$ as a metric space and exhibiting continuity for some simple functions $\mathbb R^n\to\mathbb R$. The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality relates the magnitude of a vector to its projection (or inner product) with another: \[|\langle u,v\rangle| \leq \|u\| \|v\|\] with equality iff the vectors are linearly dependent. It finds frequent use in many branches of mathematics including linear algebra, real analysis, functional analysis, probability, etc. Indeed, the inequality is considered to be among "The Hundred Greatest Theorems" and is listed in the "Formalizing 100 Theorems" project. To the best of our knowledge, our formalisation is the first published proof using ACL2(r) or any other first-order theorem prover.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.118 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicMathematics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207