MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2907705487 · doi:10.1109/soca.2018.00015

Data-Aware Web Service Recommender System for Energy-Efficient Data Mining Services

2018· article· en· W2907705487 on OpenAlexaff
Zainab Al-Zanbouri, Chen Ding

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRecommender Systems and Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRecommender systemWeb serviceContext (archaeology)Data miningWeb miningQuality of serviceEnergy consumptionService (business)Collaborative filteringWorld Wide WebInformation retrievalDatabaseComputer networkEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data analytic and data mining services are widely used these days as a result of the ever-expanding amount of data being produced from various applications. Additionally, the number of publicly available data mining and data analytic services is steadily increasing, which makes it hard for a user to select a proper service among a large number of existing candidate services. Furthermore, the quality of data mining algorithms and services implementing these algorithms can be heavily affected by the input datasets and their properties. Energy consumption is one of such QoS (Quality of Service) property. Reducing the energy consumption resulting from using web services can be beneficial to many sectors. Recommender system (RS) has been successfully used for selecting web services based on user's preferences and experiences on QoS properties. Context-aware recommender system can further improve both the recommendation accuracy and prediction accuracy by incorporating the contextual information in the recommendation process. In the existing related work, there is a limitation of not considering data properties in web service recommendation. Therefore, in this paper, we propose to add data, or more accurately, dataset properties, as a contextual information that can be integrated into the web service recommender system for data mining services. In particular, we use the matrix factorization model to implement our recommender system for recommending energy-efficient web services. Experiment results show the effectiveness of the proposed approach on our collected data. The accuracy of the QoS values prediction has been improved by 61% and the recommendation accuracy is improved by 32%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.707
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0080.005
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRecommender Systems and TechniquesFrench-language works237,207