TREATMENT OF PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURES WITH DISTAL FIXATION MODULAR REVISION STEMS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Late periprosthetic fractures of the femur are the third most frequently reported cause of surgery after total hip artroplasty. Revision total hip artroplasty can be difficult, especially when poor bone stock is encountered. The aim of this study was to examine the results of late periprosthetic fractures complicated with primary implant loosening performed with distal fixation modular revision stem. Methods From November 1999 to May 2006, 16 late periprosthetic fractures were treated with distal-fixation, modular, straight stem. There were 13 females (82%) and 3 males (18%) whose mean age at surgery was 76.7 years (range, 48 to 95 years). Femoral revision surgery was performed with the Revitan (2 cases) and ZMR (14 cases) to get a stable distal primary fixation. X-rays were assessed accordingly to the Vancouver classification: there were 3 type B2 and 13 type B3 fractures. Mean post-operative follow-up was 52 months (range, 10 to 88 months). At the time of the last follow-up visit 4 patients already passed away, all of them for causes unrelated to the procedure. The clinical outcome was monitored with the Harris Hip Score, subjective VAS, pain and satisfaction evaluation. Standard AP and lateral x-rays of the hip were obtained at each follow-up visit. Leg-length discrepancy was also investigated as a factor possibly affecting outcome. Complications included one septic loosening that was treated with a two-stage revision. Results All the patients but one were finally able to walk and had minimal to no pain at all. A satisfactory functional outcome was achieved with an average 76 (range, 25 to 100) Harris Hip Scores points. The subjective pain and satisfaction scores were respectively 2.4 and 7.8 points. As far as radiograms are concerned, all the sixteen femur did show a good healing of the fracture, with no secondary stem subsidence. Discussion Generally, considering the severity of an event such as a periprosthetic late fracture in an elderly patient, results were satisfactory. The average Harris Hip Score and subjective satisfaction would have been even higher if one patient wouldn’t have been so much disappointed because of her severe leg-length discrepancy, dependent on the acetabular side. From a surgical point of view, the employed devices proved to be handy in bridging the fracture with distal fixation while adequately stabilizing it. Conclusions According to the reported results, straight modular-revison stems provide an adequate treatment option of Vancouver type B3 and in selected cases of B2 type periprosthetic femoral fracture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".