MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2907863705 · doi:10.1109/newcas.2018.8585434

HPQ: A High Capacity Hybrid Priority Queue Architecture for High-Speed Network Switches

2018· article· en· W2907863705 on OpenAlexaff
Imad Benacer, François-Raymond Boyer, Yvon Savaria

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePriority queueQueueNetwork packetLatency (audio)USableComputer networkScheduling (production processes)ArchitectureField-programmable gate arrayQueueing theoryEmbedded systemDistributed computingTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a fast hybrid priority queue architecture usable in todays high-speed networking devices. This architecture can be used for scheduling and prioritizing packets in the network data plane. Due to increasing traffic, a high capacity priority queue, with constant latency and guaranteed performance is highly needed. In this work, an important goal is to reduce latency to best support the upcoming 5G wireless standards. The proposed hybrid priority queue architecture enables pipelined en/dequeue operations with O(1) time complexity. The proposed architecture is implemented in C++ and is synthesized with the Vivado High-Level Synthesis tool. The reported results show the feasibility of the proposed solutions and are compared across a range of priority queue depths and performance metrics with existing approaches. An implementation of the proposed architecture on a ZC706 FPGA board works at 60 MHz and supports links operating at 10 Gb/s, with a total capacity of ½ million packet tags spread over 512 independent queues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.806
Threshold uncertainty score0.733

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInterconnection Networks and SystemsFrench-language works237,207