MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2907871788 · doi:10.1002/bip.23251

Impact of tetramerization on the ligand recognition of N1 influenza neuraminidase via MMGBSA approach

2018· article· en· W2907871788 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Martiniano Bello

Bibliographic record

VenueBiopolymers · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSwine Innovation Porc
KeywordsChemistryNeuraminidaseSialic acidLigand (biochemistry)CooperativityMonomerStereochemistrySubstrate (aquarium)Molecular dynamicsCombinatorial chemistryEnzymeBiochemistryComputational chemistryReceptorOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Influenza virus neuraminidase (NA) is a homotetrameric surface protein that, in contrast to other non-influenza NAs, requires a quaternary assembly to exhibit enzymatic activity, suggesting that the oligomeric state significantly impacts the active site of influenza NA. Nevertheless, most structure-based drug design studies have been reported by employing the monomeric state in the closed or open-loop due to the computational cost of employing the tetrameric NA. In this work, we present MD simulations coupled to the MMGBSA approach of avian N1 type NA in its monomeric and tetrameric closed and open-loop state both with and without the inhibitor oseltamivir and its natural substrate, sialic acid. Structural and energetic analyses revealed that the tetrameric state impacts flexibility as well as the map of interactions participating in stabilizing the protein-ligand complexes with respect to the monomeric state. It was observed that the tetrameric state exerts dissimilar effects in binding affinity, characteristic of positive and negative cooperativity for oseltamivir and sialic acid, respectively. Based on our results, to perform a confident structure-based drug design, as well as to evaluate the impact of key mutations through MD simulations, it is important to consider the tetrameric state closed-loop state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.355

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiopolymersSame topicInfluenza Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207