MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2907890578 · doi:10.18026/cbayarsos.505987

APPLICATION OF COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT SELECTION IN AVIATION INDUSTRY THROUGH MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS

2018· article· en· W2907890578 on OpenAlexaff
Kasım KİRACI, Mahmut Bakır

Bibliographic record

VenueCelal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicMulti-Criteria Decision Making
Canadian institutionsBoeing (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAviationRanking (information retrieval)Context (archaeology)Analytic hierarchy processSelection (genetic algorithm)Operations researchAeronauticsComputer scienceAircraft industryCommercial aviationAerospaceOperations managementEngineeringArtificial intelligenceAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study is to determine the most suitable aircraft type by ranking the most demanded aircrafts by airline companies according to several criteria. In this context, the most ordered aircraft types in 2016; A320, A321, B737-800 and B737-900ER were analyzed based on their cost, performance and environmental factors. AHP, COPRAS and MOORA methods were used in the study. The findings of the study show that the results of multi-criteria decision making methods are consistent with each other and that the most appropriate type of aircraft is Boeing 737-800

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.665
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.484
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCelal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler DergisiSame topicMulti-Criteria Decision MakingFrench-language works237,207