MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2907934321 · doi:10.1353/nyh.2018.0001

Religion, Wealth, and Geographic Location: The Loyalists of Newburgh, New York

2018· article· en· W2907934321 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kieran J. O’Keefe

Bibliographic record

VenueNew York History · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAmerican History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPersecutionHistoryPlan (archaeology)GeographyLawArchaeologyPolitical sciencePolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Religion, Wealth, and Geographic Location: The Loyalists of Newburgh, New York Kieran J. O’Keefe (bio) It was April 9, 1777, and John Flewelling was on the run. Flewelling, a shoemaker and devout Anglican living in Newburgh, New York, in the Hudson River Valley, had decided to flee to British-occupied New York City. He was a Loyalist, and New York City offered protection from escalating Patriot persecution. Flewelling feared for his safety and organized an escape attempt among some of the community’s other Loyalists. They were to rendezvous at a location near the New York-New Jersey border where they would meet a pilot who had agreed to take the group of eighteen men to New York City. On the night of April 8, Flewelling put his plan into action. It was the night after the new moon, making it pitch black as he traveled south. As Flewelling neared where he was scheduled to meet the other Loyalists on April 9, he encountered a company of unknown men. Flewelling asked the men if they were also Loyalists seeking safety in New York City, and they answered yes. Flewelling invited the group to join him, telling them he was meeting other Loyalists and that he had procured a pilot. Upon reaching the rendezvous location, the unknown men revealed themselves to be Patriots. They had heard of Flewelling’s plan and determined to stop him. All eighteen Loyalists were arrested, and Flewelling was initially jailed twenty-five miles to the north in Goshen.1 Within a week Flewelling was sent to Kingston, where he was incarcerated in a prison ship on the Hudson River. On the evening of August 26, after more than four months in jail, Flewelling escaped the prison ship and trekked ninety miles south to New York City, arriving there safely several days later.2 [End Page 158] Newburgh and the Hudson Valley played vital roles in the American Revolution. The town was the site of General George Washington’s headquarters for much of the war, and was also the scene of the Newburgh Conspiracy in 1783, a threatened uprising among Continental Army officers. The Hudson Valley was often home to the Continental Army, which warily watched the British based just to their south in New York City. As a strategic location connecting the colonies with Canada, both sides vied for control of the region around Newburgh, leading to numerous battles, including Saratoga, White Plains, and Fort Montgomery. As Flewelling’s story indicates, the region also had an active and influential Loyalist population, but relatively little is known of these individuals. What are the origins of Newburgh’s Loyalist population? What were their wartime experiences? How did they adjust to life after the Revolution? Answering these questions enables us to better understand the Loyalist experience not only in the Hudson Valley, but throughout the thirteen colonies. The Newburgh Loyalists show that men loyal to the king were often from the lower ranks of society, and that geography, religion and wealth were critical to both the composition of Loyalist communities and their wartime and post-war experiences. Hudson Valley loyalism has received scant scholarly attention to date. Studies of loyalism in New York have generally examined either New York City or all of New York State. Alexander Flick’s Loyalism in New York and Philip Ranlet’s The New York Loyalists fall into the latter category.3 The authors disagree on the strength of loyalism in New York State, with Flick arguing that Loyalists comprised half the population and Ranlet arguing that they amounted to no more than 15 percent; but neither devotes much attention to Newburgh. Recent scholarship has considered loyalism more closely in and around New York City. Judith Van Buskirk’s Generous Enemies explores the interaction between the Patriot and Loyalist civilian communities there, concluding that these communities, despite living under governments hostile to one another, were in constant and frequent contact. Another recent work, Unnatural Rebellion by Ruma Chopra, examines loyalism in New York City itself. She argues that the Loyalist [End Page 159] community expected to work with the British as equal partners, only to be placed in a subservient role. The...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew York HistorySame topicAmerican History and CultureFrench-language works237,207