MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2907941349 · doi:10.1002/celc.201801842

Fe−N<sub>3</sub>/C Active Catalytic Sites for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction Prepared with Molecular‐Level Geometry Control through the Covalent Immobilization of an Iron−Terpyridine Motif onto Carbon

2019· article· en· W2907941349 on OpenAlexaff
Holly M. Fruehwald, Iraklii I. Ebralidze, Olena V. Zenkina, E. Bradley Easton

Bibliographic record

VenueChemElectroChem · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCatalysisTerpyridineChemistryX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyThermogravimetric analysisLigand (biochemistry)MetalPyrolysisInorganic chemistryChemical engineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A model for a non‐precious metal catalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in aqueous media has been prepared by functionalizing a commercial Vulcan XC‐72 carbon support with a terpyridine‐based nitrogenous ligand. The terpyridine ligand geometry allows the formation of active catalytic sites by selectively embedding a N 3 /C structural motif into the carbon support confirmed by using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements. Room‐temperature metal–ligand coordination results in the desired Fe−N 3 /C moieties on the surface. This model system was used to demonstrate the catalytic activity of the surfaces containing mainly Fe−N 3 sites for the ORR in acidic and basic media. Importantly, we demonstrate that the system could be prepared under mild reaction conditions, does not require high‐ temperature treatments, and shows catalytic activity for the ORR. Interestingly, when the system was pyrolyzed in an N 2 atmosphere at 700 °C the resulting activity declined. The non‐heat‐treated Fe−N 3 /C surface demonstrates comparable activity in acidic electrolyte medium when compared to most literature catalysts that are typically heat treated to produce four nitrogen atoms coordinated to one iron center (Fe−N 2+2 /C). Interestingly, despite the fact that many systems reported so far in the literature exhibit enhanced activity after heat treatment, our system showed an increase in activity when the material was not pyrolyzed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemElectroChemSame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207