Approximation of Fuzzy Sets by Interval Type-2 Trapezoidal Fuzzy Sets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a gradient-based method to approximate a fuzzy set through a trapezoidal fuzzy set (TFS). By adding some constraints in the formulated optimization problem, the major characteristics of the fuzzy set such as the core, the major part of the support, and the shape of the membership function could be preserved; also the form of the optimized result as a TFS is guaranteed. We regard the optimized TFS as the "skeleton" (blueprint) of the original fuzzy set. Based on this skeleton, we further extend the TFS to a higher type, that is, an interval type-2 TFS (IT2 TFS), so that more information about the original fuzzy set could be captured but the number of the parameters used to describe the original fuzzy set is still maintained low (nine parameters are required for an IT2 TFS). The principle of justifiable granularity is used to ensure that the formed type-2 information granule exhibits a sound interpretation. Both synthetic fuzzy sets and those constructed by the fuzzy C -means algorithm applied to the publicly available data have been used to demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed approximation methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".