Quantum dynamics, isotope effects, and power spectra of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mrow/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>HD</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math> excited to the continuum by strong one-cycle laser pulses: Three-dimensional non-Born-Oppenheimer simulations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Non-Born-Oppenheimer quantum dynamics of ${\mathrm{H}}_{2}{}^{+}$ and ${\mathrm{HD}}^{+}$ excited by single one-cycle laser pulses linearly polarized along the molecular ($z$) axis have been studied within a three-dimensional model, including the internuclear distance $R$ and electron coordinates $z$ and $\ensuremath{\rho}$, by means of the numerical solution of the time-dependent Schr\"odinger equation on the timescale of about 200 fs. Laser carrier frequencies corresponding to the wavelengths of ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{l}=400$ and 50 nm have been used and the amplitudes of the pulses have been chosen such that the energies of ${\mathrm{H}}_{2}{}^{+}$ and ${\mathrm{HD}}^{+}$ are above the dissociation threshold after the ends of the laser pulses. It is shown that excitation of ${\mathrm{H}}_{2}{}^{+}$ and ${\mathrm{HD}}^{+}$ above the dissociation threshold is accompanied by formation of vibrationally ``hot'' and ``cold'' ensembles of molecules. Dissociation of vibrationally ``hot'' molecules does not prevent the appearance of post-laser-pulse electronic oscillations, parallel $z$ oscillations, and transversal $\ensuremath{\rho}$ oscillations. Moreover, dissociation of ``hot'' molecules does not influence characteristic frequencies of electronic $z$ and $\ensuremath{\rho}$ oscillations. The main difference between the laser-induced quantum dynamics of homonuclear ${\mathrm{H}}_{2}{}^{+}$ and its heteronuclear isotope ${\mathrm{HD}}^{+}$ is that fast post-laser-pulse electronic $z$ oscillations in ${\mathrm{H}}_{2}{}^{+}$ are regularly shaped with the period of ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\mathrm{shp}}\ensuremath{\approx}30$ fs corresponding to nuclear oscillations in ${\mathrm{H}}_{2}{}^{+}$, while electronic $z$ oscillations in ${\mathrm{HD}}^{+}$ arise as ``echo pulses'' of its initial excitation and appear with the period of ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\mathrm{echo}}\ensuremath{\approx}80$ fs corresponding to nuclear motion in ${\mathrm{HD}}^{+}$. Accordingly, corresponding power spectra of nuclear motion contain strong low-frequency harmonics at ${\ensuremath{\omega}}_{\mathrm{shp}}=2\ensuremath{\pi}/{\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\mathrm{shp}}$ in ${\mathrm{H}}_{2}{}^{+}$ and ${\ensuremath{\omega}}_{\mathrm{echo}}=2\ensuremath{\pi}/{\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\mathrm{echo}}$ in ${\mathrm{HD}}^{+}$. Power spectra related to both electronic and nuclear motion have been calculated in the acceleration form. Both higher- and lower-order harmonics are generated at the laser wavelength ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{l}=400$ nm, while only lower-order harmonics are well pronounced at ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{l}=50$ nm. It is also shown that a rationalized harmonic order, defined in terms of the frequency of the laser-induced electronic $z$ oscillations, agrees with the concept of inversion symmetry for electronic motion in diatomic molecules.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".