MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2908028197 · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.12.019

Adaptive mesh refinement on graphics processing units for applications in gas dynamics

2019· article· en· W2908028197 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Andrew Giuliani, Lilia Krivodonova

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computational Physics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAdaptive mesh refinementComputer scienceSolverEuler equationsComputational scienceBenchmark (surveying)SubroutineParallel computingPolygon meshAlgorithmCUDAApplied mathematicsComputer graphics (images)MathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present novel algorithms for cell-based adaptive mesh refinement on unstructured meshes of triangles on graphics processing units . Our implementation makes use of improved memory management techniques and a coloring algorithm for avoiding race conditions . Both the solver and AMR algorithms are entirely implemented on the GPU, with negligible communication between device and host. We show that the overhead of the AMR subroutines is small compared to the high order solver and that the proportion of total runtime spent adaptively refining the mesh decreases with the order of approximation. We apply our code to a number of benchmark problems as well as more recently proposed problems for the Euler equations that require extremely high resolution. We present the solution to a shock reflection problem that addresses the von Neumann triple point paradox with an accurately computed triple point location. Finally, we present the first solution on the full Euler equations to the problem of shock disappearance and self-similar diffraction of weak shocks around thin films .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.723
Threshold uncertainty score0.592

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Computational PhysicsSame topicComputational Fluid Dynamics and AerodynamicsFrench-language works237,207