Concurrent Joint Hypermobility Syndrome and Spondyloarthropathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The coexistence of joint hypermobility syndrome (JHS) and spondyloarthropathy (SpA) presents a challenging clinical conundrum due to the contradictory clinical signs that may be present. Classic features such as restricted spinal movement or early morning back stiffness may not be present. Timely diagnosis and appropriate management of these patients are difficult as they tend to have lower scores on validated objective measures. METHODS: We performed a medical records review study to identify patients with both JHS and SpA who had presented to the Leicester Spondyloarthropathy clinic. Patients were diagnosed with axial SpA if they met the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria. Their imaging was reviewed by a consultant musculoskeletal radiologist. RESULTS: Four cases were identified from the patient database (female; average age, 37.5 years). All patients presented with lower back pain or sacroiliac joint pain but preserved spinal movement with a negative Schober's test. Two had a history of symptoms for more than 10 years. All had a Beighton score of greater than 6. Three of the patients were HLA positive, and 3 had a positive family history. All patients thus far have had their symptoms adequately controlled on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and physiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The coexistence of JHS and SpA is rare but important to recognize. These patients are difficult to diagnose as they may present late because of preserved spinal movements. It is unclear whether the preserved flexibility masks the true extent of disease or whether clinically they represent a less severe disease phenotype.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".