MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Transmitting Metacognitive Pedagogy to Math Pre-Service Educators

2018· book-chapter· en· W2908068471 on OpenAlexaffabout
Justin Teeuwen, Geri Salinitri

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in higher education and professional development book series · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetacognitionMathematics educationPsychologyThematic analysisIntervention (counseling)PedagogyQualitative researchCognitionSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this chapter is to investigate the impact of embedding metacognition into pre-service education with two intended outcomes: to develop pre-service educators' identification development of metacognition and to transmit metacognitive pedagogy to pre-service educators. An ethnography chronicles an intervention introduced through a mathematics methodology course for pre-service educators at a Canadian institution. The focus of the intervention emphasized explicit instruction of metacognition and the development of a metacognitive reflective practice supported by weekly metacognitive prompts. Data was collected from both students' reflections and instructor's responding prompts and were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.379 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in higher education and professional development book seriesSame topicInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsFrench-language works237,207