MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2908116846 · doi:10.1109/iecon.2018.8591124

Improved Voltage Controlled Three Phase Voltage Source Inverter Using Model Predictive Control for Standalone System

2018· article· en· W2908116846 on OpenAlexaff
Afaq Hussain, Hadeed Ahmed Sher, Ali Faisal Murtaza, Kamal Al‐Haddad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Pulse-width modulationTransient (computer programming)MATLABInverterVoltageModel predictive controlComputer scienceWeightingTotal harmonic distortionWaveformVoltage sourceEngineeringControl (management)PhysicsArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a new method for controlling the output voltage of the voltage source inverter (VSI) for stand-alone systems using finite control set model predictive control (FCS- MPC). In the existing conventional method, such as sinusoidal pulse width modulation (SPWM), the output voltage is varied by varying the amplitude modulation ratio (m <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">a</sub> ), which can be problematic if the value of (m <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">a</sub> ) exceeds 1. The conventional SPWM method also suffers from slow transient response. To solve the aforementioned problems, FCS-MPC is proposed for stand-alone VSI. The proposed method precisely controls the output voltage by varying the weighting factor of the cost function in the FCS-MPC algorithm. The proposed technique enhances the transient response, improves the THD and provide stability under all tested conditions. Based on the single step prediction set, it has a low computational load with improved performance. The feasibility of the proposed method is verified by simulations in MATLAB/Simulink.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207