Bibliographic record
Abstract
Antoinette Ehrard, Concerning the Statue of Desaix by Nanteuil in the Place de Jaude at Clermont-Ferrand. At Clermont-Ferrand, in the place de Jaude, the visitor to-day discovers, close to the monumental and fiery Vercingetorix by Bartholdi, a modest bronze statue of Desaix. Although inaugurated in August 1848, it is not of republican origin. Ten years earlier, the General Council of Puy-de-Dôme had decided to erect one, in the context of the policy of national reconciliation ordained by the King of the French, a policy that highlighted the continuity of French history wherever public commissioning was involved. The memory of Desaix benefited from this trend in art and letters. The choice of Nanteuil's project, preferred to that of Antonin Moine, whose model is conserved at the R. Quilliot Museum in Clermont, is probably due to the public notoriety of a former Prix de Rome, recently admitted to the Institute. Also perhaps to reasons of economy, for here the hero is on foot, not on horseback as in the Moine version. Be that as it may, the funding of the project was no easy task and the result did not inspire more admiration then than it does to-day. The inauguration, however, was a festive republican event. And in 1900, the statue occupied centre-stage in the ceremonies marking the Marengo centenary. The need felt by the Third Republic for the prestige of a republican general explains the honour showered on a second-rate monument which never relived that moment of glory throughout the 20tn century, let alone in June 2000.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".