MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2908162830 · doi:10.1016/j.gee.2018.12.003

An improved correlation to determine minimum miscibility pressure of CO2–oil system

2018· article· en· W2908162830 on OpenAlex
Guang‐Ying Chen, Hongxia Gao, Kaiyun Fu, Haiyan Zhang, Zhiwu Liang, Paitoon Tontiwachwuthikul

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGreen Energy & Environment · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Guangxi ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaZhoukou Normal University
KeywordsMiscibilityMole fractionFraction (chemistry)Consistency (knowledge bases)Principal component analysisMass fractionChemistryMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ThermodynamicsMathematicsStatisticsChromatographyPolymerOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An accurate and reliable estimation of minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) of CO2–oil system is a critical task for the design and implementation of CO2 miscible displacement process. In this study, an improved CO2–oil MMP correlation was developed to predict the MMP values for both pure and impure CO2 injection cases based on ten influential factors, i.e. reservoir temperature (TR), molecular weight of C7+ oil components (MWC7+), mole fraction of volatile oil components (xvol), mole fraction of C2C4 oil components (xC2-C4), mole fraction of C5C6 oil components (xC5-C6), and the gas stream mole fractions of CO2 (yCO2), H2S (yH2S), C1 (yC1), hydrocarbons (yHC) and N2 (yN2). The accuracy of the improved correlation was evaluated against experimental data reported in literature concurrently with those estimated by several renowned correlations. It was found that the improved correlation provided higher prediction accuracy and consistency with literature experimental data than other literature correlations. In addition, the predictive capability of the improved correlation was further validated by predicting an experimentally measured CO2–oil MMP data, and it showed an accurate result with the absolute deviation of 4.15%. Besides, the differential analysis of the improved correlation was analyzed to estimate the impact of parameters uncertainty in the original MMP data on the calculated results. Also, sensitivity analysis was performed to analyze the influence of each parameter on MMP qualitatively and quantitatively. The results revealed that the increase of xC2-C4, xC5-C6 and yH2S lead to the decrease of MMP, while the increase of TR, MWC7+, xvol, yCO2, yC1, yHC and yN2 tend to increase the MMP. Overall, the relevance of each parameter with MMP follows the order of TR > xC5-C6 > MWC7+ > xvol > yH2S > yHC > yCO2 > yC1 > yN2 > xC2-C4.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.355
Threshold uncertainty score0.792

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it