MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2908176493 · doi:10.3968/7752

The Aristotelian Catharsis: From Degradation to Salvation: A Study of King Lear and the Metamorphoses of His Character

2015· article· en· W2908176493 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fengli Song

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in literature and language · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCharacter (mathematics)Freudian slipCatharsisId, ego and super-egoPsychoanalysisTragedy (event)PersonalityPassionsPsychicLiteraturePsychologyPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In The Tragedy of King Lear , King Lear is always considered as a complex character and hard to be analyzed for his childlike, passionate, playful and sympathetic character. His misfortune comes form his rash haste, his childlike character, his blindness to everything under the control of his passions or affections. His miserable destiny is worth of considering and being analyzed.  According to the Freudian Personality Theory, human’s personality can be divided into three parts: the id, the ego, and the superego. Originally, the personality structure theory is used primarily to treat mental illness, and then it is developed into a critical method in literary criticism. Guided by the theory of personality structure, this thesis attempts to make a thorough exploration of the psychic conflicts and growth of King Lear in the formation of his healthy personality through the storm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.555

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in literature and languageSame topicCultural Studies and Interdisciplinary ResearchFrench-language works237,207