MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2908187714

Kurmaca Dünyadan Kadınlık Deneyimleri

2018· article· tr· W2908187714 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gizem Ece Gönül

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagetr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural and Sociopolitical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtGynecologyMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aysegul Utku Gunaydin'in Kasim 2017'de Metis Yayinlari  Bilge Karasu Edebiyat Incelemeleri’nden   cikan ve cok gecmeden Subat 2018'de de ikinci basimi yapilan  Kadinlik Daima Bir Muamma  ust baslikli, Osmanli Kadin Yazarlarin Romanlarinda Modernlesme alt baslikli calismasi, Turk edebiyati ve kadin calismalari alanlari icin onem tasir. Tanzimat doneminden Cumhuriyet'e degin kadin yazarlarin romanlarini modernlesme parametresiyle inceleyen Gunaydin hem yeni bir bakis acisi gelistirebilmis hem de tarih, sosyoloji ve edebiyat paslasmasinda disiplinlerarasi bir inceleme kaleme almistir. Bu calismada bilim dunyasiyla henuz bulusan ve ilgi uyandiran bu eserin tanitimi ve degerlendirilmesi yapilacaktir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCultural and Sociopolitical StudiesFrench-language works237,207