Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the work the comparison of the results of solving two plane problems is performed: the impact of a circular cylinder with a plane platform parallel to the cylinder axle (the flat) with an elastic layer and a second − plane strain state of nonstationary interaction of a circular cylinder with a flat with an elastic layer in a purely elastic and elastic-plastic mathematical formulation corresponding. The first contact occurs along the plane of the flat. A good coincidence of the results of the second problem at an elastic stage with the results of the first problem is shown. In the author's works a new approach was developed to solve plane and tree dimension problems of impact and non-stationary interaction in an elastoplastic formulation. The crack growing was simulated using an elastoplastic mathematical model. The numerical solution was obtained using the finite difference method scheme. The use of an elastic-plastic formulation makes it possible: 1) determine the stress-strain state at the points determined by the partitioning grid of the computational domain, not only on the surface; 2) to give a reliable description of the development of plastic deformations − the stage corresponding to plasticity is a continuation of the elastic stage; 3) reliably determine the destruction toughness. A method has been developed for calculating plastic strain fields and destruction toughness of the material using the solutions of dynamic plane problems of the stress-strain state in an elastoplastic formulation taking into account possible material unloading; 4) to verify and calibrate the solution of problems in an elastoplastic formulation for the first steps by time when the deformation process is elastic, it is convenient to use the solution of the corresponding elastic problem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".