MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2908311871

Towards a Fire Early Warning System for Indonesia (ToFEWSI)

2018· article· en· W2908311871 on OpenAlexaff
Allan Spesssa, George P. Petropoulos, Gareth D. Clay, Francesca Di Giuseppe, Muhammad Ali Imron, Hatma Suryatmojo, Dodik Ridho Nurrochmat, Armi Susandi, Symon Mezbahuddin, Craig Tribolet, Tadas Nikonovas, Mau Taufik, Robert D. Field

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Explorer (The University of Manchester) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDisaster Management and Resilience
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWarning systemEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceTelecommunications
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The severe El Niño episode of 2015 led to a major and damaging increase in Indonesian peatland fire, highlighting an urgent need to develop operational systems to forecast potentially severe fire events to mitigate the impacts of fire and haze. A total of 10 ASEAN states have formally agreed to control peatland and forest fires and urgently need a fire ‘early warning’ system. An operational early warning system for forecasting dangerous burning conditions is within reach using state-of-the-art modelling tools, such as the ECMWF’s System 5 seasonal forecast model, but is currently hampered by insufficient knowledge about the influence of fluctuations in peat moisture on fire, particularly during periods of extreme drought (e.g. 1997-98 and 2015 El Niño episodes - the strongest and second strongest on record). Most present-day fires in Indonesia result from deliberate burning for land clearance, and this human factor means that burning can be influenced by policy and altered land management practice.<br/><br/>In this paper, we present an overview of the ToFEWSI project, which started in late 2017 and is funded by the UK’s National Environment Research Council (NERC) and the Indonesia Endowment for Education (LPDP). We plan to both develop a new scientific forecasting tool for fire danger and to influence policy and fire regulations – a novel combination of urgent science and policy research. ToFEWSI will develop a suite of climate-, hydrological- and agent-based modelling tools at landscape to regional-scales to predict the incidence of peat fires for the period 1997 to 2015. It builds on previously published seasonal fire forecasting and global fire weather database work. Agent-based modelling will be employed to help simulate the complex array of bio-physical, socio-economic and cultural factors that drive observed fire activity. While focusing on the tropical peatlands of Riau province, Sumatra, we will also undertake broader analysis covering Sumatra, Kalimantan and West Papua – the three main regions experiencing unsustainable burning and deforestation in Indonesia.<br/><br/>Emissions from peatland fires is a recurrent problem often causing severe environmental and health impacts at local to global scales. These problems are projected to worsen under business-as-usual policies/governance due to: i) a likely increase in the frequency of extreme El Niño events under future climate change; ii) a growing regional population, and iii) increased demand for rainforest timber, pulp and paper, palm oil and rice. Therefore, ToFEWSI will deliver a new early warning system for fires in Indonesian peatlands and a scientifically-based policy framework for the control of such fires and their atmospheric emissions. ToFEWSI will analyse and develop evidence-based policies to address non-climate factors driving fire under extreme events, as these present the most tractable means to develop sustainable mitigation actions at village and community levels. Furthermore, ToFEWSI will help Indonesia to meet its commitments under the Paris Climate Agreement on carbon emissions reduction

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Explorer (The University of Manchester)Same topicDisaster Management and ResilienceFrench-language works237,207