MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Emerging Alberta Deep Basin Early Cretaceous Tight Plays: Results from Field Mapping of Wilrich and Lower (Basal) Fahler Strata, Spirit River Formation, Grande Cache, Alberta

2018· preprint· en· W2908315293 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sochi Iwuoha, Hooi Yee Sau

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyOutcropCretaceousStructural basinFaciesPaleontologyOil shaleGeomorphologyBedrockSedimentary rockGeochemistryPetrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The objective of this project is to describe and analyze sedimentary rocks in the field, with the intention of recognizing and conceptualizing outcrop-based analog models for basin and field-scale subsurface fluid reservoirs. The area of study herein presented lies within 15km of the Grand Cache townsite in the Alberta Deep Basin, west-central Alberta. We show in this poster Early Cretaceous Fahler and Wilrich strata of the Spirit River Formation which we mapped during the field work. We performed field gamma ray measurements over a 325 meters (~1065 feet) thick outcrop succession of basal Fahler and Wilrich units and measured a 65 meters (~350 feet) section (Rain Bet) for detailed evaluation of the facies transition and contact between the basal (Lower) Fahler and Wilrich strata. From natural fracture measurements and structural mapping, we observed that natural fracture orientation is perpendicular to the fold axis of the northwest-southeast (NW-SE) trending folds observed. Natural fracture intensity varies between the Fahler and Wilrich units with taller fractures (centimeter to decimeter-scale) observed in the more competent sandstone layers and shorter fractures (millimeter to centimeter-scale) occurring with the interbedded sand-shale layers. Both open and calcite-filled fractures were observed and highlight the need for further evaluation of the role of natural fractures in enhancing or inhibiting fluid flow in the subsurface equivalents of the outcrop strata evaluated. Introduction and Objectives The Alberta Geological Survey estimated that Wilrich strata in western Alberta contain a P50 resource of 47.9 billion barrels (Bbbls) of oil, 2.1 Bbbls of natural gas liquids (NGLs), and 246 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of gas (FOCUS, 2014). Individual gas pools in conglomeratic Fahler trends have been reported as containing more than 100 billion cubic feet (Bcf) of gas with absolute open flow (AOF) potential of >100 million cubic feet per day (MMCFD), Zonneveld (2004). Beyond the near-wellbore information that can be accessed from core or wireline log analysis, outcrops present a larger-scale view of subsurface reservoir heterogeneities and broad insights into structural and stratigraphic controls that could affect field-scale fluid storage and transport in subsurface reservoirs. In the relatively under-sampled Wilrich and Fahler strata in west-central Alberta, outcrop studies and field mapping have been deployed by previous scholars as veritable techniques for characterizing the Wilrich and Fahler subsurface Members (Newitt, 2017 and Zonneveld, 2004; to mention but a few). The objective of our fieldwork was to map the Early Cretaceous Wilrich to Lower/Basal Fahler units along a 325m road cut (Rain Bet Section) that lies between the Muskeg and Mason Thrusts ~11 kilometers outside the Grande Cache city limits as shown in the poster. We were interested in capturing and demonstrating the vertical facies transition from the Uppermost Gething and Bluesky strata which underlie the Wilrich to the overlying Lower/basal Fahler interval. Within the Wilrich and Fahler parasequences, our aim was to observe the relationships between natural fractures and sedimentary beds and consider the implications of these relationships on hydrocarbon exploration and exploitation in subsurface Wilrich and Fahler strata. Materials and Methods An RS 230 BGO handheld gamma ray Scintillometer was used to measure the natural radioactivity of the outcrop strata along the road cut. The tools spectrometer auto-stabilizes on the naturally occurring Potassium, Uranium, and Thorium radioactivity and does not require any test sources. Gamma ray readings were taken every 0.5 meters along the section resulting in 650 data points. A 1.5 metre long field pogo stick was used to measure a 65 meter section (shown as an orange rectangle on the Rain Bet profile in the poster) with detailed recognition of grain size variations (using a grain size card), sedimentary structures, lithology, bedding plane dip and strike (using a compass, Table 1), as well as the trend and plunge of paleoflows (trends were subsequently corrected). During the field trip, fold and natural fracture data were also measured and plotted on stereonets (see poster). Table 1. Dip and strike measurements at bedding contacts in the outcrop Contact Strike (degrees) Dip (degrees) Comment Wilrich - Lower/Basal Fahler 305 55 Contact Bluesky - Wilrich 300 44 Contact Results and Discussion The Wilrich interval in the outcrop is an overall coarsening upwards succession that is comprised of sandstones, shales, and siltstones with hummocky cross-stratification, suggesting shoreface deposits that are located between the fair weather wave base and storm wave base. The Lower/basal Fahler unit also features sandstones, shales, and siltstone, along with coal beds. The Lower Fahler beds show planar and wavy lamination with occasional sideritic nodules towards the top of the section. The Fahler sand beds are progradational and thicker than sand beds in the Wilrich. The direction of paleoflows is predominantly north-northeast (NNE). Folding in the study area generally trends northwest-southeast (NW-SE) with natural fractures oriented perpendicular to the fold axis. Natural fractures in the Fahler sandstones are taller (centimeter to decimeter scale) than fractures in the Wilrich which tend to jog across centimeter scale bed boundaries in the Wilrich interval. Both open and calcite-filled fractures were observed in the Wilrich and Fahler intervals. With typical core permeabilities in the Wilrich ranging from 0.01 to 0.1 millidarcies (mD), Newitt and Pedersen (2015), we opine that understanding the presence and characteristics of natural fractures in the Wilrich will be crucial in determining optimal hydraulic fracturing, completion strategies, and subsurface field development scenarios. Whereas open natural fractures may enhance the effective permeability, calcite-filled fractures may serve an opposite effect. Field development scenarios should also consider the implications of hydraulic fracture height growth out of the Wilrich interval into the overlying Fahler strata in order to mitigate against water influx into the underlying Wilrich reservoir. Acknowledgments We would like to thank Dr. Stephen Hubbard and Bram Komaromi of the Center for Applied Basin Studies (CABS) at the University of Calgary for their guidance. In addition, we thank Dr. Per Kent Pedersen of CABS and the Tight Oil Consortium (TOC) for discussions that facilitated the poster preparation. Lastly, we are grateful to Shell for providing funding to support the fieldwork and Adobe for their software donation to the University of Calgary. References FOCUS (2014). Sedimentology and rock properties of the Wilrich Formation, Western Alberta. GeoConvention 2014. https://cseg.ca/assets/files/resources/abstracts/2014/core/156_GC2014_Sedimentology_and_Rock_Properties_Wilrich_Fm.pdf Lagenberg, C. W. (1984). Structural and sedimentological framework of Lower Cretaceous coal-bearing rocks in the Grande Cache area, Alberta. CSPG memoir 9, p. 533-540. http://archives.datapages.com/data/cspg_sp/data/009/009001/pdfs/533.pdf Newitt, D. (2017). Integrated sedimentology, sequence stratigraphy, and reservoir characterization of the basal Spirit River Formation, west-central Alberta. http://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/26573 Newitt, D. J. and Pedersen P.K. (2015). Depositional Environments within the Wilrich Member, Spirit River Formation North Central Alberta. GeoConvention, May 4-8, Calgary, Alberta. https://www.geoconvention.com/archives/2015/155_GC2015_Depositional_Environments_within_the_Wilrich_Member.pdf Zonneveld, J-P. (2004). Exploration potential of the Fahler G shoreface conglomeratic trend: Evidence from outcrop. BCPG 52(1): 23-38. DOI: 10.2113/52.1.23

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis→French-language works237,207→