MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2908418060 · doi:10.1029/2018gl081095

High‐Resolution Mapping of Nitrogen Dioxide With TROPOMI: First Results and Validation Over the Canadian Oil Sands

2018· article· en· W2908418060 on OpenAlexaffabout
Debora Griffin, Xiaoyi Zhao, C. A. McLinden, K. F. Boersma, Adam Bourassa, Enrico Dammers, D. A. Degenstein, Henk Eskes, Lukas Fehr, Vitali Fioletov, Katherine Hayden, Shailesh Kumar Kharol, Shao‐Meng Li, Paul A. Makar, Randall V. Martin, Cristian Mihele, R. L. Mittermeier, N. A. Krotkov, Maarten Sneep, Lok N. Lamsal, Mark ter Linden, Jos van Geffen, Pepijn Veefkind, Mengistu Wolde

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaDalhousie UniversityUniversity of SaskatchewanEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceNitrogen dioxideRemote sensingOil sandsTroposphereSatelliteNadirAtmospheric sciencesMeteorologyGeologyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI), on‐board the Sentinel‐5 Precurser satellite, is a nadir‐viewing spectrometer measuring reflected sunlight in the ultraviolet, visible, near‐infrared, and shortwave infrared. From these spectra several important air quality and climate‐related atmospheric constituents are retrieved, including nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) at unprecedented spatial resolution from a satellite platform. We present the first retrievals of TROPOMI NO 2 over the Canadian Oil Sands, contrasting them with observations from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument satellite instrument, and demonstrate TROPOMI's ability to resolve individual plumes and highlight its potential for deriving emissions from individual mining facilities. Further, the first TROPOMI NO 2 validation is presented, consisting of aircraft and surface in situ NO 2 observations, and ground‐based remote‐sensing measurements between March and May 2018. Our comparisons show that the TROPOMI NO 2 vertical column densities are highly correlated with the aircraft and surface in situ NO 2 observations, and the ground‐based remote‐sensing measurements with a low bias (15–30 %); this bias can be reduced by improved air mass factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.281

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations449
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsFrench-language works237,207