User Selection and Multiuser Widely Linear Precoding for One-Dimensional Signalling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Emergence of ultradense networks in 5G communications, Internet of things, and eHealth devices prompts us to develop new communication techniques that can support a large number of low data rate devices. In particular, it has been shown that when the data are real-valued and the observation is complex-valued, widely linear (WL) estimation can be employed in lieu of linear estimation to improve the performance. With these motivations, we study user selection and transmit precoding in multiuser communication systems assuming transmitted signals are one-dimensionally modulated. A closed-form solution for widely linear maximum signal-to-leakage-and-noise ratio precoding is obtained. We also investigate the design of WL maximum ratio transmission, WL zero-forcing, and WL minimum mean square error precoding techniques. Furthermore, to enable an increased number of communication devices, a user selection algorithm compatible with widely linear processing of one-dimensionally modulated signals is proposed. The proposed user selection algorithm can potentially double the number of simultaneously selected users compared to that of conventional user selection methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".