MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2908450413 · doi:10.5539/ibr.v12n1p88

Principal Component Analysis on the Twitter Data in the Restaurant Industry

2018· article· en· W2908450413 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Business Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicArtificial Immune Systems Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompetition (biology)BusinessOrder (exchange)Principal component analysisMarketingSmart phoneTheme (computing)PhoneFocus (optics)Social mediaService (business)AdvertisingPrincipal (computer security)Component (thermodynamics)Computer scienceWorld Wide WebTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Social Networking Service (SNS) is prevailing rapidly in Japan in recent years. Facebook, mixi and Twitter are the popular one. These are utilized in various field of life together with the convenient tool such as smart-phone. In this paper, principal component analysis and cluster analysis are executed in order to clarify the relationship among the corporate performance and the SNS utilization condition. We focus on restaurant industry and convenience store industry, where marketing competition which utilizes SNS to consumers is fierce. Marketing application would then be extracted. Reviewing past researches, there are some related papers, but they do not handle these analysis techniques. Moreover there have been few researches made on our theme stated above. Some interesting results were obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score0.502

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.222
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it