Lead-silver anode behavior for zinc electrowinning in sulfuric acid solution
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In recent years, a renewed interest in studying the electrochemical corrosion behavior of lead anodes during zinc electrowinning is probably due to the particularly high sulfuric acid concentrations in zinc electrolyte where lead alloy anodes have high cell voltage and high corrosion rate of lead. The high corrosion rate of lead alloy resulted in Pb contamination on zinc deposit. In zinc electrometallurgy, the electrolyte from a zinc-rich ore contains a significant amount of Mn 2+ . Mn 2+ in the zinc electrolyte results in forming an oxide film on lead anodes during electrolysis. Pb-0.7% Ag anode is generally used in the zinc industry. To improve the technical performance and decrease product cost, other anodes, such as Pb-Ca or Pb-Ag-Ca or Pb-Ag-Ti or Pb-Ag-Se alloys were tested. Till now, none of them has succeeded in the substitution of Pb-Ag anodes in the zinc electrowinning. As an alloying element, silver in small quantities is considered because of the benefits that generates on the anode during electrolysis. During zinc electrolysis, lead dissolution into the zinc electrolyte can be harmful to the quality of zinc deposit. However, the lead silver alloy anode can decrease the lead content in the zinc deposit by pre-treated methods such as blasting and preconditioning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it