MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2908700038 · doi:10.4095/213080

New geological and paleontological data from the Harper Ranch Group, Kamloops, British Columbia

2002· report· en· W2908700038 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tyler W. Beatty

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroup (periodic table)GeologyArchaeologyPaleontologyGeographyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Harper Ranch Group comprises an Upper Paleozoic succession characterized by lime-stone and volcaniclastic, and siliciclastic rocks that underlie the Quesnel Terrane in the Canadian Cordillera. The relatively unmetamorphosed portion of the Harper Ranch Group outcrops immediately north and north-east of the city of Kamloops, British Columbia and is overlain by Triassic Nicola group to the north and west, and Jurassic (?) Rossland Group to the east. Recent field studies have produced new data which make it possible to divide the group into recognizable units on the basis of paleontology and apparent bounding surfaces. Additions to the body of paleontological data include: Early Mississippian (Tournaisian) cono-donts, furnishing a maximum age of the Mississippian volcaniclastic unit; Late Mississippian (Serpukhovian) goniatites providing the potential for intercalibrated conodont-goniatite biostratigraphy; and Early Jurassic (Sinemurian) ammonites dating the base of the volcanic and volcaniclastic succession unconformably overlying the Harper Ranch Group to the east.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→