MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2908712623 · doi:10.4095/214021

Geological setting of the eastern Bella Coola map area, west-central British Columbia

2003· report· en· W2908712623 on OpenAlexaffabout
J W Haggart, J. Brian Mahoney, L J Diakow, G J Woodsworth, S M Gordee, L D Snyder, T P Poulton, R M Friedman, Marlène Villeneuve

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBELLAArchaeologyGeographyGeologyCartographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jurassic and Cretaceous magmatic-arc volcanic and sedimentary strata are widely distributed across the eastern Bella Coola map area (NTS 93 D) in two northwest-trending outcrop belts. (?)Lower to Middle Jurassic arc rocks, found in the east, are correlative with the youngest part of the Hazelton Group, distributed widely to the north. Lower Cretaceous volcano-sedimentary strata are found west of the principal Jurassic arc rocks and correlate with the Monarch volcanic deposits, widespread to the south. Plutonic suites of (?) Middle Jurassic, Cretaceous, and Tertiary (Paleogene) ages increase volumetrically westward across the map area. Cretaceous plutonic rocks of ca. 122-119 Ma age may be comagmatic with the Monarch assemblage. East-west extension appears to have characterized both Hazelton Group and Monarch magmatism. Northwest-trending, steeply-dipping ductile shear zones in the central and western parts of the study area involve (?)Jurassic and (?)Cretaceous plutons but are cut by intrusions of Tertiary age.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→