MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2908729320 · doi:10.4095/213166

Field-based feasibility study of teleseismic surveys at high northern latitudes, Northwest Territories and Nunavut

2002· book· en· W2908729320 on OpenAlexaffabout
D. B. Snyder, I. Asudeh, F. A. Darbyshire, J A Drysdale

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyLatitudeField (mathematics)Physical geographyGeographyEarth scienceGeodesy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the summer of 2000, seven self-contained seismic stations were established and operated in remote areas of the Canadian north in order to assess their performance throughout the year. Two stations operated most of the year and provided high signal-to-noise ratios in teleseismic observations used to study the lithospheric structure beneath each site. For example, crustal thickness estimates of 40 to 42 (....5) km were determined for both central Baffin Island and the central Slave Province. Most sites had sufficient thermal insulation and wind- and solar-derived power to operate through much of the cold, dark, winter months. Four stations were damaged during flooding of the vault during the spring melt. These results proved that the technology used is capable of providing useful data, but further refinements and cost-effectiveness analysis are ongoing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.391
Threshold uncertainty score0.786

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207