MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2908744117 · doi:10.4095/211158

Tectonostratigraphy, structure, and geochemistry of the Mesoarchean Wallace Lake greenstone belt, southeastern Manitoba

2000· report· en· W2908744117 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christian Sasseville, K Y Tomlinson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreenstone beltGeologyGeochemistryArchean

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the Wallace Lake greenstone belt, the Conley and Overload Bay formations make up the Wallace Lake assemblage (<3.0 Ga, >2.92 Ga), and comprise a platformal sedimentary sequence and an associated mafic-ultramafic volcanic sequence with iron-formation. The Big Island composite assemblage contains three superposed tectonic slivers comprising mafic-ultramafic rocks, gabbro, and pillow lavas. The Siderock Lake assemblage comprises volcanogenic polymictic conglomerates. Geochemically, mafic-ultramafic rocks low in the stratigraphy appear to be contaminated, whereas upper units do not. The Wallace Lake, Big Island composite, and Siderock Lake assemblages are separated by layer-parallel D1 high-strain zones which are folded by northwest- and west-trending close and reclined D2 folds. Dextral shearing and east-northeast-trending folds represent a D3 event, and D4 produced S-shaped kink bands within older high-strain zones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.258
Threshold uncertainty score0.519

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→