MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2908803677 · doi:10.4095/294859

The hydrogeological characteristics of the Upper Cretaceous De Courcy Formation (Nanaimo Group), from a subsurface core, groundwater observation well, Cedar, British Columbia

2014· report· en· W2908803677 on OpenAlexaffabout
A P Hamblin, T. McCartney

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyHydrogeologyCretaceousGroup (periodic table)GroundwaterCore (optical fiber)PaleontologyGeotechnical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new inquiry into the groundwater potential of the Nanaimo Lowlands was jointly undertaken by concerned municipal, provincial and federal agencies because rapid population growth and expanding industrial development are, and will continue to, put pressure on the limited groundwater resources. The bedrock component of the project focused on the characterization of the aquifer potential of the Upper Cretaceous Nanaimo Group, as a likely target of importance. This unit is a thick succession of 11 intertonguing sandstone-dominated and shale-dominated formations, of which only the lower 8 are present in the defined study area. As one step in the analysis, a 112.5 m core was obtained as part of the drilling of a Groundwater Observation Well in the Cedar area of Vancouver Island, about 10 km SE of Nanaimo City centre. The entire length of the core comprises the mid-Nanaimo Group, sandstone-dominated (potential aquifer zone) De Courcy Formation, the uppermost coarse grained formation in the study area. The De Courcy Formation present in the studied core is characterized by stacked, thick bedded medium to coarse grained arkosic sandstone separated by units of bioturbated sandy siltstone with thin finer grained sandstone. It includes two main facies: 1) thick bedded, grey medium to coarse grained sandstone interpreted as high-energy density current and turbidity flow deposits emplaced in a moderately deep marine setting on the surface of, and in channels on, a northwestward-sloping submarine fan system, with minor thin beds of bioturbated siltstone, and 2) thinly interbedded dark grey bioturbated siltstone to sandy siltstone interpreted as lower-energy, background sedimentation on the surface of the submarine fan systems, and very fine to medium grained sandstone, interpreted to represent slower, more distal, higher-energy density current turbidity flow events which occasionally punctuated that quiet background sedimentation. The thick bedded sandstone facies represents about 65% of the strata in the core, and has porosity ranging 2.0 to 10.2 %, averaging 6.8 %, and permeability ranging 2.8 to 105.0 mD, averaging 24.4 mD. In thin section, these sandstones are predominantly feldspathic litharenites and lithic arkoses with abundant plagioclase, volcanic rock fragments, quartz and chert, in a clay matrix. Multiple, laterally-extensive units of thick, porous and permeable sandstone, up to 6 m thick, likely represent significant aquifer horizons within the De Courcy Formation. The interbedded siltstone and thin sandstone facies occupies about 35% of the core strata and has porosity ranging 4.0 to 9.7 %, averaging 7.4 %, and overall permeability ranging 1.8 to 40.0 mD, averaging 12.7 mD. However, within this facies, the thin sandstone beds have an average permeability of 15.4 mD, whereas the bioturbated siltstones have average permeability of only 5.4 mD. Multiple, laterally-extensive units of interbedded siltstone and thin sandstone, up to 6 m thick, may represent significant aquitard horizons within the De Courcy Formation. These results, although derived from the De Courcy Formation only, may display comparative analogies to the characteristics of the other (uncored) potential aquifer zones present lower in the Nanaimo Group; the Comox, Extension and Protection formations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score0.306

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological formations and processes→French-language works237,207→