REFLEXOTHERAPY IN COMPLEX POSTOPERATIVE REHABILITATION FOR LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective. To assess the acupuncture efficiency for conservative treatment and postoperative rehabilitation of patients with spondylolisthesis. Material and Methods. The study group included 42 patients with spondylolisthesis complicated by root syndrome. After surgical intervention the patients underwent treatment consisting of corporal acupuncture and drug therapy (NSAID, diuretics, vitamins, muscle relaxants). The McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), visual analog scale (VAS) and EMG-examinations were used for pain assessment. Results. Drug therapy contributed to pain decreasing in 10 % of patients on the first day of treatment and in 35 % – on the third. Complete relief of pain syndrome occurred in 55 % of patients on the fifth day. The combination of drug therapy and acupuncture provided complete reduction of pain syndrome in 95.4 % of cases during 5 days. Conclusion. It is advisable to apply corporal acupuncture to complex postoperative rehabilitation of patients with spondylolisthesis complicated by root syndrome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".