MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2908861364 · doi:10.1109/epec.2018.8598360

Microgrid Feasibility Study for Future Smart Communities: A Case Study for London, Ontario

2018· article· en· W2908861364 on OpenAlexaffabout
Elham Akhavan Rezai, G.C. Stevens, Ehab F. El‐Saadany

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooJacobs (Canada)S2e Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrogridRenewable energyGreenhouse gasFlexibility (engineering)Architectural engineeringEnvironmental economicsSustainable developmentZero-energy buildingSmart gridComputer scienceSustainabilityEfficient energy useSmart citySystems engineeringEnvironmental resource managementEngineeringInternet of ThingsComputer securityEnvironmental sciencePolitical scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given the international focus on microgrids, smart communities and smart city developments, this paper presents the first large-scale fully integrated net-zero energy (NZE) smart community under development in Canada, which creates a showcase for sustainable design and draws society to participate; with the overall goal of developing a new community with minimal impact on the environment. The conceptual microgrid design considerations are illustrated along with discussions and analyses of feasibility indicators such as energy efficiency, system flexibility, renewables penetration, and GHG emission reduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.173

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207